JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 11, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Armando Novoa Garcia /Sintramienergetica Vs. Colgas S.A.

✓
Topic · hard data
Nulidad Sentencia T-920/02
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad Sentencia De Revision De Tutela
  • Procedencia excepcional
  • Requisitos
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se rechazó la solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-920/02 proferida por la Sala Quinta de Revisión de Tutelas, presentada por el Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de la Industria Minera y Energética SINTRAMIENERGETICA, toda vez que aunque se presentó en el tiempo estipulado no presentó las razones que sustentan su solicitud.

Contra este pronunciamiento no procede recurso alguno.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Rechazar la solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-920 de 2002, proferida por la Sala Quinta de Revisión de Tutelas, presentada por el Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de la Industria Minera y Energética SINTRAMIENERGETICA.
  2. Segundo. Contra este pronunciamiento no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.